🔥 Biogas vs Biomethane: Why Upgrade to Natural Gas Quality? | AD Explain...

Biogas vs Biomethane: Why Spend More When "Good Enough" Seems... Well, Good Enough?

Here's a question that puzzles many newcomers to the renewable energy sector: If biogas is so marvelous, so renewable, so revolutionary... why are operators spending millions to upgrade it?

It's a legitimate head-scratcher. After all, biogas has been hailed as a wonder fuel for decades. It turns waste into energy. It's carbon-neutral. It's proven technology. Industry veterans wax lyrical about its benefits at every conference and trade show.

So why isn't everyone satisfied with just producing biogas and calling it a day?

Why are so many anaerobic digestion facilities investing heavily in expensive upgrading equipment to transform their biogas into biomethane? What's driving this industrywide shift toward purification? And perhaps most importantly—is it actually worth the extra investment?

Let's unpack this puzzle, because the answer reveals something fundamental about where the renewable energy industry is heading.

The Biogas Paradox: Marvellous... But Limited

First, let's be clear: biogas genuinely is marvellous. There's no deception in the industry's enthusiasm for it.

When organic waste—agricultural residues, food scraps, sewage sludge, or energy crops—breaks down in an oxygen-free environment inside an anaerobic digester, it produces biogas. This mixture is typically 50-70% methane, 30-50% carbon dioxide, plus trace amounts of hydrogen sulfide, ammonia, siloxanes, and water vapor.

That methane content means biogas packs real energy. For decades, farms, wastewater treatment plants, and industrial facilities have successfully burned raw biogas on-site to:

• Generate electricity through combined heat and power (CHP) units
• Produce thermal energy for heating buildings or industrial processes
• Power the digester itself, making operations self-sufficient
• Reduce fossil fuel consumption
• Cut greenhouse gas emissions dramatically

This works. It's proven. It's economically viable, especially for smaller operations.

So what's the problem?

The Dirty Little Secrets About "Raw" Biogas

Here's where things get interesting—and where that initial puzzlement starts to make sense.

Raw biogas isn't quite the plug-and-play wonder fuel that enthusiastic marketing might suggest. Those impurities? They're not just minor inconveniences.

The Corrosion Factor

Hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) is particularly nasty. Even in small concentrations, it's:

• Highly corrosive to metal components, engines, and infrastructure
• Toxic to humans and destructive to equipment
• Expensive to manage through constant maintenance and replacement parts

Operators using raw biogas need specialised equipment designed to handle these corrosive compounds. Engines require more frequent servicing. Pipework needs regular inspection and replacement. The operational headaches and costs add up quickly.

The Moisture Problem

Water vapor in biogas causes additional challenges:

• Condensation can damage equipment and block pipes
• Freezing in cold weather can shut down entire systems
• Requires constant monitoring and drainage

The Siloxane Threat

Siloxanes—silicon-based compounds from personal care products that end up in wastewater—create silicon dioxide deposits when biogas burns. These deposits:

• Coat engine components like sandpaper
• Reduce efficiency and lifespan dramatically
• Require expensive engine rebuilds

The Quality Inconsistency Issue

Perhaps most frustratingly, raw biogas composition varies constantly depending on feedstock, digester conditions, and seasonal factors. This variability makes it:

• Difficult to optimise combustion
• Unreliable for sensitive applications
• Challenging to meet any quality standards

The "Good Enough" Trap

Given these limitations, raw biogas users typically find themselves in what we might call the "good enough" trap.

Yes, they're generating renewable energy. Yes, they're reducing their carbon footprint. Yes, they're turning waste into something valuable.

But they're also:

• Locked into on-site use only (can't feed into gas grids with such low quality)
• Limited to heat and power applications (can't access transport fuel markets)
• Stuck with local electricity prices (which may be poor or volatile)
• Dealing with constant maintenance headaches (corrosion, deposits, breakdowns)
• Missing out on premium renewable fuel markets (which offer better long-term contracts)
• Unable to scale or relocate their energy (it must be used where it's produced)

It's "good enough"... until you realize what you're leaving on the table.

Technology Has Moved On—And So Have The Markets

Here's where the puzzle pieces start clicking into place.

The renewable energy landscape has transformed dramatically over the past decade. What made perfect sense in 2010 or even 2015 no longer represents the optimal strategy in 2025.

Several game-changing developments have occurred:

1. Upgrading Technology Has Become Affordable and Efficient

Biomethane upgrading systems—which strip out CO₂, H₂S, water vapor, and trace contaminants—have become:

• More efficient: Modern systems achieve 98-99%+ methane purity
• More affordable: Economies of scale have reduced capital costs significantly
• More reliable: Proven track records with minimal operational issues
• More compact: Smaller footprints suitable for mid-sized operations

Technologies like pressure swing adsorption (PSA), membrane separation, water scrubbing, and chemical scrubbing have matured from experimental to mainstream.

2. Gas Grid Infrastructure Has Opened Up

Countries across Europe, North America, and beyond have developed comprehensive frameworks for biomethane injection into natural gas grids. This means:

• Clear technical standards and connection procedures
• Grid operators actively seeking renewable gas sources
• Streamlined permitting and approval processes
• Growing injection capacity nationwide

Your digester no longer needs to be next to your customer. The existing gas infrastructure becomes your distribution network.

3. Transport Fuel Markets Have Exploded

Heavy goods vehicles, buses, and fleet vehicles are rapidly adopting compressed natural gas (CNG) and liquefied natural gas (LNG) as cleaner alternatives to diesel. Biomethane fits this application perfectly:

• Drop-in replacement for fossil natural gas
• Dramatically lower carbon intensity (often negative when waste-sourced)
• Qualifies for premium renewable fuel incentives and credits
• Growing fueling station infrastructure
• Long-term contracts available from major fleet operators

4. Policy and Incentive Frameworks Favor Biomethane

Governments worldwide have implemented policies that specifically reward biomethane:

• Renewable fuel standards with preferential treatment for waste-derived fuels
• Carbon pricing mechanisms that value biomethane's low carbon intensity
• Renewable energy certificates and similar tradeable instruments
• Tax advantages and accelerated depreciation for upgrading equipment
• Grid injection subsidies to encourage renewable gas production

These frameworks often make biomethane significantly more profitable than biogas electricity generation.

5. Long-Term Contract Markets Have Matured

Perhaps most importantly, biomethane enjoys access to stable, long-term offtake agreements that biogas electricity simply cannot match:

• 10-15 year contracts at fixed or inflation-linked prices
• Corporate buyers seeking renewable gas for sustainability commitments
• Utilities requiring renewable content to meet regulatory mandates
• Transport companies locking in low-carbon fuel supplies

This revenue stability makes project financing easier, reduces risk, and improves overall returns.

Running The Numbers: The Economics That Changed Everything

Let's look at a hypothetical comparison that illustrates why the industry has shifted so dramatically.

Scenario: Medium-Sized Agricultural AD Plant (500 kW biogas production)

Option A: Raw Biogas for Electricity (Traditional Approach)

• Capital cost: £1.5 million
• Electricity generation: ~4 million kWh/year
• Revenue (at £0.10/kWh): £400,000/year
• Operating costs (higher maintenance): £150,000/year
• Net annual revenue: £250,000
• Revenue certainty: Subject to electricity price volatility
• Payback period: ~6 years

Option B: Upgraded Biomethane to Grid (Modern Approach)

• Capital cost: £2.5 million (includes upgrading equipment)
• Biomethane production: ~280 m³/hour (~2.5 million m³/year)
• Revenue (at £0.25/m³ equivalent): £625,000/year
• Operating costs (lower maintenance): £120,000/year
• Additional renewable fuel credits: £100,000/year
• Net annual revenue: £605,000
• Revenue certainty: 15-year fixed-price contract
• Payback period: ~4.5 years

The upgraded option costs £1 million more upfront but delivers:

• 142% higher annual net revenue
• Faster payback despite higher capital cost
• Significantly better long-term contract security
• Lower operational headaches and maintenance costs
• Multiple revenue streams (gas sales + environmental credits)
• Better financing terms due to contracted revenues

These aren't marginal differences. They're transformational.

Why "Going The Extra Mile" Actually Makes Perfect Sense

When we step back and look at the complete picture, the puzzle resolves itself completely.

Spending more to upgrade biogas to biomethane isn't an unnecessary luxury—it's smart business.

Here's why operators are increasingly choosing purification:

1. Market Access vs. Market Captivity

Raw biogas locks you into whatever local electricity prices happen to be. Biomethane gives you access to:

• National and international gas markets
• Transport fuel sectors
• Industrial gas users
• Heating markets
• Export opportunities

You're no longer captive to a single buyer or market.

2. Premium Pricing vs. Commodity Pricing

Electricity from biogas often receives standard renewable electricity rates. Biomethane accesses:

• Renewable fuel premiums
• Low-carbon fuel standards credits
• Carbon offset values
• Green gas certificates
• Corporate sustainability contracts

You're selling a premium product, not a commodity.

3. Contract Stability vs. Price Volatility

Biogas electricity typically faces:

• Volatile wholesale electricity prices
• Seasonal demand fluctuations
• Grid curtailment risks
• Shorter contract terms

Biomethane offers:

• Long-term fixed-price agreements (10-15+ years)
• Inflation-linked price escalations
• Contractual take-or-pay protections
• Predictable, bankable revenues

You're building a business, not gambling on spot markets.

4. Future-Proofing vs. Legacy Technology

The energy transition is accelerating toward:

• Decarbonised gas grids (biomethane fits perfectly)
• Electrified light vehicles (but gas-powered heavy transport)
• Hydrogen blending in gas networks (biomethane compatible)
• Negative emission fuel requirements (waste-derived biomethane qualifies)

Raw biogas electricity generation increasingly looks like yesterday's solution. Biomethane positions you for tomorrow's opportunities.

5. Operational Simplicity vs. Constant Maintenance

Ironically, despite the more complex upgrading process, biomethane operations often prove simpler day-to-day:

• No corrosive H₂S attacking components
• No siloxane deposits destroying engines
• No moisture condensation blocking systems
• More consistent quality requiring less adjustment
• Less frequent equipment replacement

You spend more upfront to spend less forever after.

The Psychological Shift: From "Waste Management" to "Energy Production"

There's also a crucial psychological dimension to this transition that often goes unrecognised.

Operators who produce raw biogas for on-site use often still think of themselves primarily as waste managers who happen to generate some energy.

Operators who upgrade to biomethane increasingly see themselves as energy producers who happen to use waste as feedstock.

This shift in identity matters because it changes everything about how you approach the business:

• Investment decisions: Energy producers think in terms of maximising energy value, not minimising waste costs
• Partnerships: Energy producers build relationships with gas utilities, transport companies, and corporate buyers
• Scale: Energy producers plan expansion based on market opportunities, not just on-site needs
• Innovation: Energy producers adopt new technologies to improve product quality and market access
• Financing: Energy producers can access energy-sector capital and favourable debt terms

This mental model shift unlocks strategic thinking that simply doesn't occur when biogas is viewed primarily as a beneficial byproduct of waste treatment.

When Raw Biogas Still Makes Sense

To be fair and balanced, there absolutely remain scenarios where raw biogas without upgrading remains the optimal choice:

• Small-scale operations where capital costs for upgrading cannot be justified
• Remote locations far from gas grid infrastructure
• Operations with high on-site thermal demand that can use all the energy locally
• Facilities where electricity prices are particularly favorable and secured long-term
• Projects with very limited capital availability that cannot access upgrading financing
• Situations where feedstock consistency is poor making upgrading challenging

For these cases, biogas CHP remains an excellent solution. There's no shame in the "traditional" approach when it genuinely fits your circumstances best.

But for many—perhaps most—modern AD projects, these limiting conditions don't apply.

The Industry Inflection Point

We're witnessing an inflection point in the anaerobic digestion industry.

What was once a niche technology for waste treatment that happened to produce some useful energy is transforming into a mainstream renewable fuel production sector.

The signals are everywhere:

• Major energy companies entering the biomethane sector
• Automotive manufacturers committing to gas-powered heavy vehicle production
• Governments setting ambitious biomethane production targets
• Investment funds pouring billions into AD and upgrading facilities
• Gas utilities actively recruiting biomethane producers
• Corporate buyers signing long-term renewable gas agreements

The market is speaking loudly and clearly: Biomethane is the future, and raw biogas is the past.

So What's Really Going On Here?

Returning to our original puzzle: If biogas is so marvellous, why are so many upgrading it?

The answer, it turns out, isn't complicated at all.

Biogas is marvellous—but biomethane is better.

Technology has moved on. Markets have evolved. Policy frameworks have matured. The economics have shifted dramatically.

What seemed like an unnecessary expense five or ten years ago now looks like an obvious investment for most projects.

Going "the extra mile" to purify raw biogas into pipeline-quality biomethane opens up a world of:

• Higher-value applications
• Larger and more stable markets
• Better long-term contracts
• Premium pricing
• Multiple revenue streams
• Reduced operational headaches
• Future-proof positioning

The operators making these investments aren't falling for marketing hype or chasing shiny new technology for its own sake.

They're following the money, the markets, and the future of energy.

The Bottom Line

If you're evaluating an anaerobic digestion project today, the question isn't really "Should we upgrade to biomethane?"

The better questions are:

• "Do we have access to gas grid infrastructure?"
• "Can we secure long-term biomethane offtake contracts?"
• "Does our scale justify the upgrading investment?"
• "How do the economics compare in our specific market?"

For an increasing proportion of projects, the answers to these questions point decisively toward biomethane upgrading.

The puzzle isn't why operators are spending more—it's why anyone thought "good enough" would remain good enough forever.

Technology advanced. Markets matured. And the smart money followed.

That's what's really going on here.

---

Want to dive deeper into the technical and economic comparison between biogas and biomethane? Check out our comprehensive guide: Biomethane vs Biogas: Complete Comparison

What's your take? Are you operating a biogas facility and considering upgrading? Or planning a new project and weighing your options? Share your thoughts in the comments below.